Category Archives: Articles

Article-length features written by Jim Johnson

2020 Astronomy Guide

As things do from time to time, new ideas pop into my head, and a pursue what of them that I can. Writing a guide like this seems like a great way to gather many sources into one, easy to use location.

As can be seen in this article, and in the Events Calendar, 2020 will be an astronomically busy and interesting year!

The Best Meteor Showers

Meteor showers occur as a result of Earth passing thorough a comet’s orbital path, which is strewn with debris that were left behind as its ices vaporized during close passes of the Sun. Some key points to note when going out to observe a meteor shower is the date and and time of day for peak meteor rates, Moon’s phase, meteors per hour and location in the sky. Some showers begin a week or more before the peak, but the peak will be the best opportunity for a great show. The time of day is important, and most are best observed around midnight, or in the pre-dawn hours. As most meteors are quite dim, the Moon’s phase/location in the sky is a factor. If the Moon is full, which means that it is bright and up all night, at the time of a shower many meteors will be washed out. A dark sky location is important for this same reason. The important clue to the location in the sky is the meteor’s name. All meteors associated with a named shower will appear to radiate from the constellation for which it is named. Leonids’ radiant, for instance is in the constellation Leo. Concentrating on the area of the sky halfway between the radiant and the zenith seems to work best for most showers. And a word about comfort. Dress warmly and perhaps use blankets or a sleeping bag. It is colder than you think, even in the summer. Also, a patio lounge chair will eliminate strain on the neck.


The planets can be observed wandering among the stars. Movements of the fast-moving inner planets, Mercury and Venus, can be detected from one night to the next. Mars, slower and farther out, can be seen to move in the course of a month. Jupiter and Saturn require several months before noticeable movement is detected. This movement, always close to the ecliptic, occasionally results in interesting conjunctions with other planets, the Moon, or bright stars that lie along the ecliptic.

An interesting position for the inner planets is greatest elongation (from the Sun). Because Mercury and Venus’ orbit lies inside Earth’s, the size of their orbit limits how far these two planets can be separated from the Sun as they wander. Mercury is most easily seen within a few days of this event, and Venus is near its brightest.

An interesting position for the outer planets is opposition (from the Sun). This is the point where the Sun, Earth and a planet fall in a straight line with Earth in the middle. Where ever the Sun is, look in the opposite direction to see the planet at opposition. This is when the planet is closest to Earth, and therefore it appears larger and more detailed in the telescope, and it is at its brightest.

Planetary Movements to Watch.

Mercury will make three evening appearances in the western twilight and three morning appearances in the pre-dawn eastern twilight. Look for this elusive planet about 15 minutes after sunset, or 30 minutes before sunrise at the times of it’s greatest elongation from the Sun.

Greatest eastern elongations (evening) are March 23, July 22, November 10.

Greatest western elongations (morning) are February 10, June 3, and October 1.

Venus will already be two months into an evening apparition as 2020 begins. It will be bright well-placed for observation until mid-April, at which time it will be at its greatest elongation, and appear telescopically as a “half” Venus. Venus will coincidentally be near its brightest near greatest elongation. As it continues along its orbital path, it will grow larger, and will present an increasingly thinner crescent as it begins to grow dimmer and move closer to the Sun as this apparition ends in May. It will be prime for telescopic views as it enters its crescent phases in mid-April.

Mars begins the year as a morning object in an apparition that will last until 2021. Look for a lunar occulatation in February. It starts the year rising at 4 am, and it will continue to rise earlier each morning until it begins rising before midnight, thus becoming an evening object in mid-May. Mars reaches opposition in mid-October, which is when it will be closest to Earth, and it will present its brightest appearance. Near opposition, amateur astronomers with modest telescopes can observe the redder and darker areas of the planet to detect its daily rotation, and polar ice caps can be observed.

Jupiter begins apparition in that will last into 2021 when it emerges from behind the Sun in mid-January. It rises earlier each morning until it becomes an evening object rising before midnight on May 11th. Jupiter reaches opposition on July 13, when it is closest to Earth. Watch Jupiter as it is chased across the sky by Saturn all summer and fall, culminating in a spectacular and exceedingly close conjunction at about 1/10° separation on December 21st. Telescopically, changes in Jupiter’s bands, transits of The Great Red Spot, and movements of the Galilean moons are among the most interesting planetary phenomena for amateur astronomers.

Saturn also begins its next apparition in January, just a few days after Jupiter. It reaches opposition on July 20th, just a week after Jupiter. Read about Jupiter in the paragraph above for information about Saturn – Jupiter interaction this year. Saturn’s rings are the solar system’s show stopper, even in small telescopes. Bands on the planet’s surface, and some of its moons can be observed with a modest telescope.

This site’s Events Calendar can be monitored for dates of the events described here, and others.

Did I Image 2I/Borisov this Morning?

Bottom line up front, at this point I have no idea if I photographed 2I/Borisov, (the comet, hereafter) or not.

Here’s what I have to go on so far. The first image depicts a Stellarium rendering of the star field in which the comet was located when I imaged it this morning. Its computed location is indicated with a red X.

Stellarium frame rendering of Comet 2I/Borisov’s star field as of 20191207 0514EST. Annotations by Jim Johnson, December 7, 2019.

Next is an actual telescopic image from this morning. It is annotated to guide the reader through this discussion.

Annotated image of Comet 2I/Borisov taken 20191207 0514EST by Jim Johnson.

The frame scale and orientation are almost exactly the same for both the Stellarium rendering, and this morning’s photograph. Also in both images are green lines that highlight groupings of stars I used to determine that I had at least photographed the star field that should contain the comet.

In the actual photograph, I have placed a red circle in approximately the same relative location that the Stellarium rendering expects the comet to be, but I cannot see anything in this location.

I have also circled in blue two objects in the photograph that are not in the Stellarium rendering, and that are brighter than I expect the comet to be. I believe that these two objects are not stars, because I have done a lot of detailed comparisons between Stellarium renderings and actual photographs of the same star field. I have never found Stellarium to miss a star.

But I cannot say that they are the comet. That there are two unidentified objects instead of one in the photograph is suspicious.

Their brightness is suspicious too. The comet is projected to be 15.6 magnitude. Keeping in mind that a larger number equates to a dimmer object this would be a very dim object, even if it were a star. But comets are diffuse objects, not pinpoint objects like a star. This means that a comet’s reflected light is spread out over a wider area than a star, thus making it appear dimmer than a star of the same magnitude.

In the annotated photograph, I marked the magnitudes of three reference stars in orange. All three of these stars are of a lower (brighter) magnitude than the comet is projected to be, but even so, two of these three stars appear dimmer than the two circled objects. The third (11.2 magnitude), suggests that both of the unexplained objects in the blue circle are roughly 11th magnitude.

As I confessed at the beginning of this article, I do not know if I captured Borisov or not, but I have some guesses. One thing that could account for the separation between the blue circle (actual location of something), and the red circle for the computed location is that cometary data are updated periodically, and perhaps a future update will provide a more accurate computed location that places them within the blue circle. Another possible scenario that I would assess as highly unlikely, is that the comet broke into two pieces, and all of the freshly exposed ices caused the comet to flare up in brightness. Still not probable is that the flare up pushed the comet off of its original path, thus creating the discrepancy between the blue and red circles.

I will keep an eye out for news and cometary data updates for the next few days and report any new findings.

The Ecliptic – A Trace of the Sun’s Path across the Celestial Sphere

The title of this article is a concise and precise definition of the ecliptic, but further explanation is warranted. Before delving in, I recommend reviewing  the definition of a conceptual celestial sphere and reading Understanding a Star Chart  to prepare for the material presented in this article. Although the ecliptic is an important aspect of lunar and planetary observations, and seasons on the Earth, this article will concentrate on the Sun’s movement among the stars, and how that movement defines the ecliptic.

As the Earth proceeds through its annual journey in its orbit about the Sun, the Sun’s position among the background stars, as seen from Earth changes a little each day. Since we intuitively know that the Sun outshines all of the stars in the sky, so this seemingly makes no sense. But imagine the Sun as a disk no brighter than the Moon. We could then see the Sun and the “fixed” stars on the celestial sphere at the same time, and we could track the Sun’s movements among the stars on a day to day basis. In a year’s time after beginning this exercise, the Sun will have returned to the point at which it started and we will have traced out the full course of the ecliptic across the celestial sphere. The twelve constellations through which the Sun traverses during this annual journey are known as the zodiacal constellations.

The Solar Cycle. Addison-Wesley Longman. Accessed by Jim Johnson on February 13, 2015.

The Sun in the preceding image is in a fixed position for the purpose of this discussion. The Earth orbits the Sun as indicated by the blue circle with dates indicating progress through one orbit over the course of a year. Consider the Earth’s position on the blue circle on March 21st. When viewed from the Earth on this date, the Sun appears in the constellation of Pisces. Now consider the Earth’s position six months later on September 21st, and trace a line from the Earth through the Sun to see that it would appear in the constellation of Virgo.

The specific line that the Sun seems to trace among the fixed stars on the celestial sphere as a result of Earth’s orbit about the Sun is called the ecliptic, and is indicated by the horizontally oriented sine wave on the flat projection map of the entire celestial sphere below. This is a great place to start an exploration of the ecliptic. This particular map is a scan of the actual constellation map carried aboard the Apollo 11 lunar expedition. First, let’s become familiar with this map.

Flown Version of LM G&N Dictionary, Apollo 11, Page S-1, May 29, 1969-BD. Private Collection. Scans Courtesy Larry McGlynn. Accessed by Jim Johnson on July 18, 2014.
Flown Version of LM G&N Dictionary, Apollo 11, Page S-1, May 29, 1969-BD. Private collection scans courtesy of Larry McGlynn. A11StarCharts.html. Accessed by Jim Johnson on July 18, 2014.

The horizontal lines are representations of degrees of declination, with 0° declination, or the equator across the center of the page, and the north (+90° declination) and south poles (-90° declination) are at the top and bottom edges of the page, respectively. Note that the vertical lines representing hours of right ascension do not converge at the poles (top and bottom edges of the map), because this is a flat projection.

To more closely relate the flat projection map to the celestial sphere, note that the zero hour of right ascension on the right edge of the map and the 24th hour on the left edge of the map are one and the same, so the right and left edges of the map can be brought together with the observer in the imaginary center of the map tube that is formed. The implication of this is that if one’s point of gaze slips off of the left edge of the map at, say +40° declination, the point of gaze would immediately appear on the right edge at +40° declination.

Compare this map to the sky map that follows below, and that was discussed in Understanding a Star Chart. The sky maps are contained within a circle that represents the horizon, and the stars contained therein are the stars that can be seen above the horizon at a specific point in time.  The Apollo 11 flat projection, however, represents the entire celestial sphere. The ecliptic on the sky map below is designated by the yellow horizontal line that stretches from east to west, just north of the equator.

Let’s trace the ecliptic on the sky map below and compare the various aspects discussed with the Apollo 11 constellation chart above. Begin at the western horizon, where at that point the ecliptic lies south of the equator. Moving eastward (toward the left) along the ecliptic, notice that it crosses the equator (0°) at 0 hours (0h) of right ascension in the constellation of Pisces.  At 6 hours of right ascension (6h), the ecliptic reaches its farthest distance north of the equator in Gemini, at which point it begin converging on the equator again just below the eastern horizon at 12h. Note that the ecliptic transverses several zodiacal constellations on this map. From west to east, they are: Pisces, Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, and Leo.

Annotated Sky Map, Jim Johnson, December 27, 2015.


Now we are ready for a more thorough exploration of the ecliptic, which presents as a sine wave on the annotated Apollo 11 map below.

A11StarChart-S1 annotated by Jim JohnsonThe Sun’s journey from one end of the ecliptic to the other, or from the right edge of the map to the left edge of the map, is exactly one year, then the cycle repeats. There are four very important  points through which the Sun passes in its annual journey across the ecliptic. The two points at which the ecliptic intersects the equator (0h and 12h) are called equinox, and the points at which the ecliptic reach its farthest declination from the equator (6h and 18h) are called solstice. Let’s step through the Sun’s journey across the ecliptic as presented by starting at the left edge of the map.

1. The Sun’s arrival at the 0-hour of right ascension, or the intersection of the ecliptic and the celestial equator (0° declination), occurs around March 21st. This is known as the Vernal Equinox, or the beginning of astronomical spring. On the date of the equinox, the length of the day and the length of the night are about equal. Astronomical spring extends three months from this date while the Sun travels toward the intersection of the 6th hour of right ascension and +23° declination.

2. The Sun’s arrival at the 6th hour of right ascension coincides with it’s northern most declination of +23°. This point is known as the Summer Solstice, and it occurs around June 21st, marking the first day of astronomical summer. Astronomical summer extends for three months past this date as the Sun descends southward back toward the intersection of the ecliptic and the celestial equator at the 12th hour of right ascension.

3. The Autumnal Equinox is marked by the Sun’s arrival at the 12th hour of right ascension as it makes its south bound crossing of the celestial equator. This occurs on about September 21st each year, and is known as the first day of astronomical fall, which endures for three more months until the Sun reaches its southern most point on the ecliptic. For the second time in a year, the days and nights are of about equal length while the Sun is on or near the celestial equator.

4. The Winter Solstice is marked by the Sun’s arrival at the 18th hour of right ascension, and its most southward point on the ecliptic at -23° declination, on about December 21st each year. This is known as the astronomical beginning of Winter, which endures for the next three months as the Sun ascends northward toward the celestial equator.

As noted while describing the Sun’s travels from one edge of the map to the other, it also changes travels northward and then southward in declination from the equator reaching an maximum of +23° declination and -23° declination. This ±23° change of declination is related to the tilt of the Earth’s axis relative to the ecliptic, or the plane of the solar system, and this north and south movement of the sun is related to our four seasons on Earth. This topic will be addressed more thoroughly in The Ecliptic and the Four Seasons. The planets “wanderings” among the fixed stars is also related to the ecliptic, and this topic will be addressed more thoroughly in The Ecliptic and the Motions of the Planets. Look for these two articles in the coming months.

© James R. Johnson, 2015.

Orion, The Great Hunter

OrionThe Orion constellation is visually one of the brightest, most distinct, and most recognizable constellations in all of the night sky. It is one of the most telescopically interesting constellations as well. Associated with and following Orion from the left are Canis Major and Canis Minor, the Hunter’s greater and lesser dogs. Immediately below Orion’s feet Lepus, the hare, flees the two dogs.

Once found for the first time, Orion is immediately recognizable on sight for a lifetime. It is rather well placed high in the southern sky right after sunset in February and March, located just south (below) a direct imaginary line drawn between Gemini and Taurus. Orion can be seen ascending in the eastern sky a few hours after sunset in December and January, and it can be seen setting in the western sky a few hours after sunset in April and May. The three almost equally spaced and almost perfectly aligned belt stars of almost equal brightness are likely to be the first thing noticed once an observer knows when and where to look. After finding the belt, identify the bright the stars outlining the torso, and be sure to look more closely for the dimmer stars that comprise Orion’s club and shield on either side of his torso. And finally, his dagger hangs below the left end of the belt stars. Within the dagger is The Great Orion Nebula, a reddish fuzzy blob that can be seen with the unaided eye.

As evidence that Orion attracted much of the ancient astronomers’ attention, this constellation has many named stars. Forming the head and shoulders are Betelgeuse (Alpha Orionis), Meissa, and Bellatrix. The belt is formed of Alnitak, Alnilam, and Mintaka, and marking the ends of the legs are Saiph and Rigel. Learn these names and point the stars out to friends that you wish to impress!

The deep sky objects is where Orion_Head_to_Toethis constellation gets really interesting. All of the nebulae in Orion are part of the Orion Molecular Cloud Complex, which is over 1,500 light-years away and is several hundred light years across. The Complex is as large as the Orion constellation itself, but is too dim to see except in deep exposure astrophotographs. This is one of the most intense star forming regions that we can see from Earth, containing both young stars and protoplanetary disks. Much of this region is bright in the infrared region of the spectrum due to the intense heat generated by star forming processes. Barnard_33The largest component of the Cloud, Barnard’s Loop, begins just below Orion’s right shoulder, loops toward the left above and around the belt, and ends at Orion’s right foot. the Horsehead Nebula, the Flame Nebula and the Running Man Nebula are among the most notable non-Messier nebulae in the Complex. The Great Orion Nebula (M42), perhaps the most famous Messier object of all, is located in the dagger suspended below the left end of Orion’s belt.  While visible with the unaided eye, this star forming region is increasingly more stunning through binoculars and telescope, and is an exceptional photographic object. Picture saved with settings embedded.Providing much of  M42’s illumination is a tight star cluster known as the Trapezium, which is usually photographically over saturated in  the center in order to capture the nebula’s fainter detail at its periphery. The four-star trapezoidal asterism is easily within reach of small telescopes, but the cluster actually consists of about eight stars. This little jewel is really neat to see at the eyepiece of a small telescope. Other Messier objects in the Cloud Complex are M43 and M78.

IAU Orion chart, IAU and Sky & Telescope magazine (Roger Sinnott and Rick Fienberg), June 5, 2011.

© James R. Johnson, 2014.

Finding Barnard’s Star


In early October, a Scope Out Next Month reader asked me to “photo the nearest star, and tell us about it.” The Alpha Centauri system of three gravitationally bound stars is actually the our closest stellar neighbor at about four light-years away. A telescope is required to discern the two dimmer components Alpha Centauri B and C. Alpha Centuari A, however, is similar to our Sun in size, mass and spectral family, and appears to us as the third-brightest star in all of the Earth’s night sky. This star is located sufficiently deep in the southern hemisphere sky that it is perpetually hidden from view at from my northern location of 39° north. In order to account for the closest star that I could photograph, I qualified the question with “visible from my northern hemisphere location” and the star that I seek becomes Barnard’s Star, our fourth closest stellar neighbor after the three stars of the Alpha Centauri system. This star is quite unlike our Sun. It is a low-mass red dwarf that even at about six light years away is too dim to be seen with the naked eye. An interesting characteristic of this star is that it has the highest proper motion against the “fixed” background stars of any star that can be observed from Earth. As I will describe later, the reader’s question is not the beginning of my journey to Barnard’s Star.

I did my homework (planning) and managed to get out on a clear night to capture a photograph that included Barnard’s Star. I have since written up a description of this object and posted it and the photograph to Jim Johnson’s Astronomy Web site. The reader next tells me that it boggles his mind that I can find a specific star out of all of those billions. I started writing a quick response to unboggle (unbottle?) his mind, but the scope of this response soon grew much more involved than I had anticipated. I eventually abandoned the email in favor of this essay-length piece that I could more widely share by posting to my Web site. This article is about the principles, planning and techniques that I used to find Barnard’s Star.

To define the problem, let’s first examine two easy techniques to find a celestial object. If I were looking for a bright naked-eye object, such as the Moon, Jupiter, or Saturn, finding it and photographing it would be quite simple. I simply point the telescope at the object by aiming the telescope’s red dot finder at the object, and the object, which I can clearly see without the telescope, can also be seen within the eyepiece field of view with little if any additional adjustment of the telescope. There is also an easy way to find objects that cannot be seen with the naked eye. A computer-driven GOTO telescope mount can be commanded to drive the telescope to the object’s coordinates, and GOTO capabilities are within reach of amateur astronomers with very modest telescopes. But alas, Barnard’s Star is too dim to see with the naked eye, and I do not have a GOTO mount! Let’s explore how else I can point the telescope at an object that is too dim to see and is hidden among so many other stars.

Let’s begin with a discussion about what can and cannot be seen either with an unaided eye, a telescope, or a photographic exposure. The two primary factors are the brightness (or darkness) of the sky compared to the brightness (or dimness) of the object, which is essentially a signal-to-noise ratio proposition. Objects (signal) that are dim will be increasingly lost in the background as the sky (noise) becomes brighter.  This is why astronomers crave dark skies! The apparent brightness of a star as seen from Earth is measured on a magnitude scale. For example, Vega, a very bright star in The Summer Triangle, is a 1st magnitude star. Brighter stars have lower magnitudes and even go in to negative magnitudes, and dimmer stars have higher magnitudes. A 6th magnitude star is about the dimmest star that we can see in a completely dark sky. In a light-polluted urban setting, a 4th magnitude star might be the limit, and perhaps 3rd magnitude becomes the limit if the full moon is above that urban horizon. Barnard’s Star is a 9.6 magnitude object, so I am not able to observe it directly. This is where the light gathering ability of a binocular or a telescope comes in. At some point for a given telescope’s optics, long-duration photographic exposure is required to detect very dim objects.

There are a few guiding principles to keep in mind in finding an object like Barnard’s Star that cannot be seen with the unaided eye. First start with brighter things that can be seen with the unaided eye, and work down toward increasingly dimmer objects that can be seen at the eyepiece and then things that can only be seen in a long-duration photographic exposure.

The next principle is to start at a wide field of view. As the desired star field is identified and centered up at each stage, proceed by increasing magnification, which also has the effect of narrowing the field of view and bringing increasingly dim stars into view.

And the final principle is that it is important to select the correct magnitude of stars displayed in each chart so that the charted stars match what is seen with the unaided eye (wide view/5th magnitude and brighter), at the eyepiece (medium view/10th magnitude and brighter) and in the image (close view/14th magnitude and brighter). As extreme examples, including stars down to 14th magnitude in the wide field chart would overwhelm the chart with thousands upon thousands of stars, and selecting only down to 5th magnitude stars in the close field of view chart would yield a chart with just one star. Neither chart would be useful in our quest for Barnard’s Star.


At the planning stage, I am indoors, and at the computer. The first step, is to identify the constellation in which the target is located, and where the target is within that constellation. I also want to know the target star’s right ascension and declination, which is the sky’s rough equivalent to the latitude and longitude on the Earth’s surface, so that I can precisely locate the target in a star chart. I find this information in Wikipedia and make a note that Barnard’s Star is located in the constellation Ophiuchus at 17 hours, 57 minutes and 49 seconds of right ascension, and +4 degrees, 41 minutes and 36 seconds declination. For my immediate purpose , Ra 17h58m/Dec +4d42m is quite close enough. Plus 4 degrees, by the way, means four degrees north of the celestial equator.

I take the right ascension and declination information to Cartes du Ciel, the freeware charting software that I use, and note that Barnard’s Star is located in the northeastern part of the constellation Ophiuchus. In order to complete this exercise, I need to prepare three charts that are centered on Barnard’s Star’s location. The first one is a wide-field, constellation-level chart that will help me point the telescope to the right part of the sky. The stars in this chart are of roughly the same magnitude as those that can be seen with the unaided eye. Narrowing down the field of view a little more, a medium field of view chart will help identify the stars that can be seen at the telescope eyepiece. And finally, a narrow field of view chart will be needed to see even dimmer stars, which provide the context needed to positively identify the target star in a long-duration photographic exposure.

The final step in planning is to determine if Barnard’s Star’s constellation, Ophiuchus, can be viewed in the sky on the date and at the time that I wish to attempt a photograph, or 7pm in mid-October in this exercise. This step is necessary because the time of day and the time of year determines whether the desired constellation is visible in the sky, or where it is in the sky. Why? Because any object or any given set of right ascension/declination coordinates does essentially what the sun does, it makes approximately one revolution about Polaris each day due to the Earth’s rotation. Holding the time of day constant and stepping through a year’s worth of days, an object or set of coordinates makes one rotation about Polaris in a year due to the Earth’s orbit about the Sun.

To illustrate the annual rotation, lets follow Ophiuchus over the course of a year. In October it is visible in the western sky in the evening after sunset, and due to the Earth’s daily rotation about its axis, it too sets below the horizon about four hours after the sun does. Each evening, the progression of the Earth’s orbit about the sun causes Ophiuchus to appear just a little closer to the sun than it did the evening before, and the interval between sunset and Ophiuchus setting below the horizon gets almost imperceptibly shorter from one evening to the next. Two months later in December, Ophiuchus has already set below the horizon before it is dark enough to see its stars. Between December and January, the Sun is located near the star field represented by Ophiuchus, and rendering it completely impossible to see this constellation at any time during the day. By January, Ophiuchus can be seen again as it emerges from behind the sun, and rises in the east just before sunrise. Each morning, it rises just a little earlier, and by May it rises in the east just after sunset, which means that it is easily seen in the early evening. And finally, by October it is once again visible in the west as soon as it is dark enough to be seen.

To complete this final planning step, I set a planosphere for 7pm in October, and I could also see that Ophiuchus was above the horizon in the west. With an observation plan in hand, and having ascertained that the target will be well-placed in the sky, I begin monitoring my observatory’s Clear Sky Chart to find a suitable evening to set up the telescope and execute my plan.


A clear evening finally arrives, so it is now time to begin working outdoors at the telescope. To follow along, first open and examine the wide field chart, which charts the stars that I can expect to see with my unaided eye. Since I cannot see Barnard’s Star directly, I will have to work with what I can see to help me point the telescope toward the star field where Barnard’s Star is located. First, examine the wide field chart to become familiar with the constellation and the location of Barnard’s Star therein. The red circle and rectangle near the center of the image are centered on Barnard’s Star, even though this particular star is not bright enough to appear on this chart. Note the right ascension and declination coordinates on the bottom and left edges of the chart, and that the circle and rectangle are indeed centered on the coordinates that I looked up earlier on Wikipedia. The circle represents the field of view of the Panoptic 35mm eyepiece that I intend to use to directly view the star field, and the rectangle represents the field of view of the Canon EOS 60Da camera with which I will capture images. Also note in the upper left corner of the image that stars of magnitude 5 and brighter are displayed, and that the field of view is almost 180 degrees, or essentially the whole visible sky.

With this sense of scale to help me determine where to point the telescope, I proceed by devising a star hopping strategy. I select Beta Ophiuchus as my visual jumping off point to Barnard’s Star, and since this star is not easily confirmed in my light-polluted back yard, I first locate the brightest, closest, most easily identified object that I can find, The Summer Triangle. In the chart, the Triangle stars, connected by my light colored triangle annnotation, are Alpha Lyra (Vega), Alpha Cygnus (Deneb), and Alpha Aguila (Altair). I first hop from Altair and Vega via the red lines to Alpha Ophiuchus, the brighest star in that constellation and then down to Beta Ophiuchus, the second brightest star and my jumping off point for arriving in the vicinity of Barnard’s Star. I then find all of these stars in the sky, eyeball the scale and distance, and place the telescope’s red dot finder to the point in the sky just to the left of Beta Ophiuchus.

To follow at this stage, open the medium-field of view chart and examine it. There are a few things to note here. First, the magnitude in this chart is increased to display stars down to magnitude 10.3 and brighter, there are now stars visible within the circle and rectangle, and the circle and rectangle appear much larger as the field of view has narrowed from 180 degrees down to 11 degrees. Second, I note the two most distinct objects in the chart: the sharks nose (my naming) asterism of stars that I connected with red line segments in the upper left of the rectangle, and Ophiuchus 66 in the lower left of the rectangle. If I can bring the the shark’s nose and Ophiuchus 66, which is much brighter than anything near it, into the eyepiece field of view, then Barnard’s Star (white carat) must also be in the field of view. The implication of this fact meant that I did not need to positively identify Barnard’s Star while I was a viewing at the eyepiece. I could, however, see what I thought to be Barnard’s Star, but the dimmer stars needed to confirm this sighting were not visible in the eyepiece.

It is time to locate the desired star field in the eyepiece and capture an image. The wider field of view of the eyepiece compared to the camera’s field of view, and the fact that I can see the star field move in the eyepiece in real time as I search for the correct star field helps me locate the correct star field much faster. On the night that the image was captured, I was fortunate to find the shark’s nose asterism and Ophiuchus 66 with only minor moving around once I pointed the red dot finder just to the left of Beta Ophiuchus. Next, I centered up my intermediate targets in the eyepiece, and swapped out the eyepiece for the camera at the telescope’s rear aperature and refocused. I snapped a single 25-second image, and voila, I could see the asterism and Ophiuchus 66 in the camera’s rear display. Open the actual full frame image that I captured and do a side-by-side comparison with the medium field of view chart. Also note that the orientation of the full frame image and the frame in the medium field of view chart are not the same. It was not important that the camera frame have the same orientation as the chart, because my mission in life at this point was simply to capture the shark’s nose and Ophiuchus 66 in the same frame.


I am back indoors at the computer, and not necessarily on the same night, to perform the analysis that will confirm that I found Barnard’s Star. To follow along at this stage, open the close field of view chart. Note that it display stars all the way down to magnitude 14.2, and many more stars are visible. The field of view, which is now only about 1 1/2 degrees (compared to the original 180 degree field of view), is completely inside of the camera’s rectangular field of view as noted by the rectangle in the previous chart. Ophiuchus 66 can be seen way down in the lower left corner, and I connected the shark’s nose stars with a white dotted line. In order to positively identify Barnard’s star, which is annotated, I first matched the brighter stars in the chart with those in the in the image. I used a red line in the image to mark a star hopping path from the tip of the shark’s nose through the dimmer stars down to Barnard’s Star, and I highlighted a wishbone asterism that caught my eye in some online images of Barnard’s Star. Open the cropped image of the star field and do a side-by-side comparison with the image of the close field chart, and see if you can star hop from the tip of the shark’s nose to Barnard’s Star in the cropped image. For extra credit, devise an alternate star hopping path and reconfirm the result, or even repeat this exercise in any Barnard’s Star image that you find online.


I feel a great sense of accomplishment in finding and photographing this star, and it pleases me greatly to share my work. I should share with you that this exercise was slightly over-simplified, because no transformation is required to equate the chart view to the images captured by the camera. At the eyepiece, a star field may be flipped horizontally, vertically or in both directions, depending upon the type of telescope (reflector or refractor) and whether a 90-degree prism is in the optical path determines whether transformation is required. If needed, the chart can be set to display the stars as they will be seen in the eyepiece by flipping the chart horizontally, vertically, or in both directions to match the eyepiece view.

So what’s next? I have known since childhood that Barnard’s Star has the fastest proper motion of any star that we can see from Earth, and I have dreamt of demonstrating this motion for myself for as long as I have known this fact. Sure, I can look at existing images of the star field that have been taken during my lifetime, and plot its motion. But now that I have captured my own baseline image, I need only capture another image at some point in the sufficiently distant future and note that its location has shifted from the baseline image, and I will have demonstrated this motion for myself! The optics/sensor combination that I used in October equates to about 1.6 arcseconds per pixel, and Barnard’s Star’s movement of 10.3 arcseconds/per year should result in about six pixels of movement relative to the background stars. I will take a second photograph in a year, and attempt to detect Barnard’s Star’s movement, and report back my finding.

An interesting consequence of Barnard’s Star being so close to us is that it has a very high parallax shift against the “fixed” background stars as the Earth moves from one side of the Sun to the other in a six-month, or half-orbit period. To demonstrate parallax shift, hold a pencil point out at arm’s length, close one eye and note the point’s position against the more distant background. Without moving the pencil, view the pencil point with the other eye open, and close the first eye. Note how the point shifts against the background. Before six months from October rolls around, I will be doing some analysis to determine if it is possible for me to detect Barnard’s parallax shift against the background stars in April when the Earth has moved around to the other side of the Sun. The distance between the two observation points, which is analogous to the distance between one’s eyes in the pencil illustration, is roughly 193-million miles. If it is mathematically possible with my telescope/sensor combination, I will attempt to detect Barnard’s parallax shift and report back.

As a bonus, this exercise has demonstrated that imaging Pluto is within my reach! The prospect of producing my own images of Pluto (still a planet in my mind, logical arguments for why Pluto is or isn’t a planet notwithstanding!) also captured my imagination in grade school when I saw first saw Clyde Tombaugh’s pair of images taken on the nights of the 23rd and 29th of January in 1931. Next July 4th, when Pluto and Earth are at their closest approach for 2015, Pluto’s angular velocity will be about 1 1/2 arcminutes per day, which is almost 200,000 times faster than Barnard’s Star’s motion (10.3 arcseconds) against the background stars! This means that I can detect Pluto’s motion by taking images just a few days apart instead a year apart. Pluto’s magnitude will be about 14.1, which is brighter than some of the stars that are visible in my Barnard’s Star image. I can improve my chances of detecting Pluto by exposing just a little longer, and by stacking multiple images to reduce background noise.

© 2014 James R. Johnson

The Milky Way: How to See our Galaxy

The Milky Way Galaxy is the galaxy that contains our solar system. Milky Way also refers to the diffuse band of light that arcs across the summer sky from Sagittarius in the southeast to Cassiopeia in northwest. It’s name is derived from its “spilled milk” appearance.

I recall seeing the Milky Way often as a child growing up in semi-rural Georgia, but I have not been able to see it where I presently live because the light-polluted sky is brighter than the Milky Way. It is best seen as far away from city lights as possible, and on a Moonless night.

What I hope to do in my treatment of the Milky Way is relate the band of light that is seen stretched across they sky to the structure of the spiral galaxy that the Milky Way actually is. In order to make this leap, I must do three things: 1) describe a spiral galaxy’s structure and appearance by using far away galaxies and a Frisbee as proxies, 2) describe the Solar System’s location within the Milky Way Galaxy, and 3) take an imaginary journey to our location inside of the Milky Way Galaxy.

Before proceeding, it will be helpful for us to reacquaint ourselves with light and time, and their relationship to distance. Light travels in photons that are either emitted from hot objects like light bulb filaments, or reflected off of cooler objects, like the walls. The Sun and Moon are also emission and reflection objects, respectively. Photons travel from their source to our eye or camera sensor at, well, the speed of light. We can express this speed in terms with which we are already accustomed, like miles per hour (mph). Since light travels at 186,282 miles per second, that equates to 670.6 million mph. That is incredibly fast! Since mph has a distance component (miles), we can use the speed of light, or the speed of anything else, to measure distance. If something is 670.6 million miles away, we can also say that it is one light-hour away.

The amount of time involved essentially becomes the yardstick. The Moon is about two light-seconds away. The Sun is eight light-minutes away. A light-hour does not get us all the way to Saturn, and the closest star is four light-years away. Galactic sizes are on the scale of hundreds of thousands of light-years, and intergalactic distances are on the scale of millions and even billions of light-years. There’s nothing like the distances across the vast emptiness of space to make light seem to flow like molasses.

An implication of light’s incredibly slow speed is that our eyes are essentially time machines. The point at which Saturn appears in the sky is actually where it was over an hour ago. Similarly, The Andromeda Galaxy, our closest galactic neighbor, is seen as it was 2.5 million years ago. A supernova detected today in a galaxy located 11 million light-years away actually happened 11 million years ago. With your mind sufficiently bent, let’s proceed on our three-step journey to “see” our place in the galaxy.

1. Structure and Appearance of a Spiral Galaxy
We can learn much about the structure of a spiral galaxy by observing neighboring galaxies that we can see from various perspectives. We learn from these observations that a typical spiral galaxy is a disk that is thin at its edges, and becomes thicker at points toward the center. There are essentially three perspectives that matter: face-on, edge-on, and in any perspective between the two.

The first perspective to consider is that of a galaxy viewed edge-on. From this perspective, a galaxy’s profile is thin at its edges and it grows increasingly thicker toward the center, and there is a noticeable bulge at the galaxy’s center. The line of sight is through the longest dimension of the disk, so billions of stars contribute to a distant galaxy’s faint glow that we perceive through an amateur telescope. These features can be seen in NGC 4565, which is an example of an edge-on galaxy located about 43 million light-years away. Zoom in on the image at the link and notice that there are brighter areas were masses of stars can be seen, and other areas where the stars are obscured by dust lanes. A Frisbee flying toward you at eye level would present a profile similar to that of an edge-on galaxy.

The second perspective to consider is that of a galaxy viewed face-on. It will appear as a near perfect circle with spiral arms of dust and stars. Generally, a face-on galaxy will be brighter in its center, because stars are more densely aggregated about the galactic center, and because the disk is thickest at the center bulge. Messier M74, located about 32 million light-years away, is an example of a galaxy viewed face-on. Click on the image and zoom in, and again notice the bands of stars and bands of dust. A Frisbee seen lying on the ground has a similar circular profile.

A third perspective would be a view from any perspective other than edge-on or face-on. The profile of such a galaxy is elliptical, with the flatness of the ellipse being related to the offset angle. Messier M31 (Andromeda Galaxy) is an example that is located 2.5 million light-years away, which makes it the Milky Way’s closest galactic neighbor. Our Earth-bound view of M31 is about half way between edge-on and face-on perspectives. Zoom in on the image at the link to see all of the features previously described in the face-on and edge-on perspectives of galaxies.

Even though a galaxy contains billions of stars, it is important to keep in mind that a galaxy is mostly vast tracts of empty space. Our galaxy is so vast in size that we can only see a tiny bit of it. It is believed to be about 120,000 light-years in diameter and it is believed to contain about 250 billion stars. In contrast, the farthest star that we can see with the unaided eye is a very bright one that is about 4,000 light-years away, but something on the order of 500 light-years is typical of the most distant stars that we can easily see from Earth. Within this radius, that are only about 5,000 individually resolvable stars that can be seen by the unaided eye. When stars are viewed at greater distances, they are too dim to resolve individually and the apparent distance between stars grows smaller. As a result, when looking toward the center of our galaxy where stars are more densely packed, we see literally billions of stars that are too dim to be individually resolved, but the combined effect of these billions of stars is that they are perceived as a diffuse patches of light.

2. Location of the Solar System.
The solar system is located within the flat disk of the Milky Way Galaxy, and is about 27,000 light-years from its center. Since The Milky Way Galaxy’s diameter is 120,000 light-years, its radius is 60,000 light years. Thus, we are located just inside a point about half way between the center of the galaxy and its outer edge. Since there are more stars concentrated in the galaxy’s center we will see more stars when gazing in that direction than when we are gazing outward toward the nearest edge where stars are more sparsely spread. To mark a corollary of our location on say a 10″ Frisbee, one could put a star sticker about 4 1/2 inches from its center. More precisely, our location is beneath the star, somewhere about half way between the top and bottom of the Frisbee’s cross section.

3. A Journey to the Solar System
Let’s begin our imaginary journey to the Solar System’s location within the Milky Way Galaxy. In order to scale this journey down to something we can more easily understand, we will once again employ the Frisbee proxy. To orient ourselves, lets first stand near the Frisbee and look down upon it observing a profile similar to the face-on view of the galaxy. Note the location of the star sticker that we put on the Frisbee to mark our notional location. Now place yourself at a point where you are on a line drawn outward from the center of the Frisbee through the star sticker, and now take three or four steps away from the Frisbee in the direction of this line, and place your eyes down at ground level so that the Frisbee is viewed edge-on, and imagine that the Frisbee is our own Milky Way Galaxy. Initially, the view of the galaxy will appear similar to the example edge-on galaxy, NGC 4565, that we examined earlier. Please have this image fresh in your mind before we start moving, because this is how our galaxy appears from our initial vantage point.

At long last we begin our journey, and as we approach the Milky Way Galaxy, its appearance does not change much from the edge on view of NGC 4565. It will only grow proportionately wider and thicker in size as we move closer to the Milky Way’s center. At about 300 light-years from the disk’s edge, individual stars immediately ahead become individually resolvable. A glance in the direction away from the Milky Way is eerily devoid of stars . Once inside the edge, the nearest stars will begin to “fly” past us in a manner similar to what is seen on certain Windows screen savers or on Star Trek. Ahead of us we still see the patchy fog of the dense galactic core as the backdrop for the foreground stars, and behind us we can see some stars, but against a completely dark backdrop. Finally, we reach the Solar System and stop. Because an overwhelming majority of all the Milky Way’s stars are still ahead of us in its dense center, the only significant change in the galaxy’s appearance since we began our journey is that it grew wider and thicker as we moved closer.

Now that we understand a spiral galaxy’s structure and appearance, know our location in the Milky Way Galaxy, and have seen what happens as we fly into the galaxy from its edge, let’s now examine a fish eye photographic image of the Milky Way on the National Geographic Web site. The Milky Way appears as an arch in this image due to fisheye distortion, so to get a true perspective, imagine that the arch is straightened out. Compare this Milky Way image with the edge-on image of NGC 4565 previously viewed. Can you see…bright patches of unresolved stars? …dark dust lanes? …a flattened, edge-on disk? …a bright central bulge? Armed with enough information, it is possible to gaze upon the Milky Way as seen in the summer sky from Earth and understand that it is actually the disk of the Milky Way Galaxy!

© James R. Johnson, 2014.

Collimating a Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope

Telescope collimation refers to alignment of the elements in its optical system. Perfect alignment is required to achieve optimal performance of any optical system. Otherwise, contrast and detail are lost. This guide focuses (pun intended) on the Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope (SCT) design, which is susceptible to misalignment. Periodic collimation is required for casual observing to correct misalignment that results from normal handling and transportation of the telescope. Even more frequent collimation is required of the perfectionist who wishes to account for collimation errors caused by pointing the SCT at different objects at different positions. This is what can occur when a telescope “leans” in another direction after collimation has been perfected. When seeking high resolution at higher magnifications, one should ideally collimate on every object observed or photographed. This might seem like an excessive burden, but it becomes second nature and can be quickly accomplished with practice. The superior result produced by perfect collimation is worth this price.

Few people, other than astronomers, appreciate the multiple skill sets that are required to plan, set up, and execute an observing or imaging session. Collimation is just another skill that an astronomer must master, because the difference between mediocre and great collimation is astounding! I cannot imagine why an astronomer would put so much effort into a session without checking collimation, and adjusting if necessary. My goal in writing this article is to shorten the learning curve to achieving really good collimation with the hope that astronomers will be more inclined to adopt collimation as a regular part of their set up.

This guide begins with a description of the phenomenology that is evaluated to determine if precise collimation is achieved. Next is a description of an SCT optical system, and how it is adjusted to achieve precise collimation. After the phenomenology involved and the SCT optical system are understood, the basics of collimating an SCT can be explored along with the rational that explains the details behind each concept. With a firm grasp of the basics, all that is left is to provide the procedures that are used to actually collimate an SCT.

The Phenomenology

A collimation process can be followed with great results without really understanding the telescope or the phenomenology that is being exloited, but that is seldom satisfactory for astronomers. They often want a deeper understanding of what is really going on in order to permit application of expert judgement in their tradecraft. In order to understand what is really going on, an explanation of some phenomena and concepts is required. The key phenomena associated with collimation is the concept of a pinpoint light source, and how it interacts with an optical system. In addition to collimation and a pinpoint light source, I will also cover the Airy disk and diffraction rings.

The essence of collimation is how photons travel with respect to one another. Light from a point source arriving at an optical system is considered collimated if all photons are travelling parallel to one another. A collimated optical system transmits collimated light to a single point at the focal plane. Generating a collimated light source for a microscope might be tricky, but Astronomers are lucky. They have access to a sky full of collimated pinpoint light sources. Each star is so far away that it cannot be magnified larger than a single point, and thus all of the photons arriving at the telescope are collimated. Consider an object like Jupiter than can be resolved to a disk with a telescope. Details on the disk can be observed because every point on the disk is a separate pinpoint light source. A telescope’s job is to preserve all of these pinpoint sources through the optical path to the focal plane. A telescope can only achieve this feat when correctly collimated.

The Airy disk is named after George Biddell Airy, who in 1835 provided the first theoretical description of how an optical system resolves a pinpoint light source. The Airy disk is the smallest disk that is formed by a pinpoint light source in a given optical system. All other things being equal in two telescopes, the telescope with the larger aperture is said to have more resolving power, because it is capable of resolving a pinpoint light source into a smaller Airy disk. This smallest disk implies perfect focus, and any other focus position produces an enlarged blob of light. Surrounding the Airy disk is one or more alternating light and dark rings of equal spacing known as diffraction rings. These rings can be seen only under the very best seeing conditions. Diffraction rings are formed as the result of light waves interacting with the circular aperture of the telescope. The spacing of these rings is a function of wavelength of the light.

The SCT Optical System

The optical path of an SCT from entry to exit consists of a corrector plate, a primary mirror, and a secondary mirror. For this discussion, front means the end of the telescope pointing toward the observed object, and back means the other end of the telescope where the gathered light is focused onto an eyepiece or sensor. Light arriving at an SCT first encounters the corrector plate at the front of the telescope. The corrector plate is so gently curved that it has the appearance of a flat pane of glass. The purpose of its optical curvature is to correct for spherical aberration. This is necessary because the next optical component, the primary mirror, is spherically curved, which means that it is incapable of bringing light rays to a single point of focus without a corrector. The aperture of an SCT is determined by the diameter of the primary mirror, which is located at the back of the telescope. It reflects light forward toward a focal point. This mirror is perforated at its center, and it can be adjusted forward or backward to achieve focus. The next element in the optical path is the secondary mirror, which is mounted in the center of the corrector plate. It is usually spherical in shape, which continues to focus the light. This is the final optical component that the light encounters before achieving focus just to the rear of the center perforation in the primary mirror.

The Basics

This guide offers a couple of techniques rough collimation techniques should be used before proceeding to the precision collimation procedure, unless a precise collimation was obtained during a recent observing session. Before proceeding to the details of either a rough or precise collimation, There are some basics that apply to all collimation techniques. Do not attempt to follow these basic steps, but do read them carefully to understand the concepts before proceeding to and actually following the rough or precise alignment procedures. Before collimating, always allow the telescope to thermally stabilize, which could take an hour or more.

Tilting the secondary mirror with respect to the primary mirror is the only mechanical adjustment required to collimate an SCT. Looking at the front of the telescope, the secondary mirror housing is located in the center of the corrector plate. If a central screw is present on the front of this housing, it should never be adjusted. Somewhere between the center of the housing and its outside edge are three adjustment screws situated 120° apart. The mirror itself is located on the back side of this housing. The adjustment screws control the tilt of the secondary mirror, and they hold it in tension against a central pivot. The tilt of the mirror is changed by loosening and tightening the adjustment screws, thereby pivoting the mirror about the central pivot. A single adjustment requires that all three screws be turned in order to change the tilt AND maintain the tension. For instance, if a certain adjustment screw must be tightened to achieve a desired effect, then the other two screws must first be loosened to prevent the adjustment without over tightening the first screw. Conversely, if a screw must be loosened, then loosen that screw first and complete the adjustment by tightening the other two screws to keep the mirror snug against the central pivot. Most SCTs come with adjustment screws, but after market adjustment knobs that are easier to use are available. That knobs can effectively hold collimation is the subject of debate. I recommend screws if collimation is only checked periodically to ensure that collimation remains acceptable over a longer period of time. Knobs, being easier to adjust, are probably just fine when collimation is checked frequently. Did I say that the central screw, if present, should never be adjusted?

A defocused pinpoint light source is used for rough collimation, and in the initial step of a precise collimation. When defocusing a pinpoint light source, three things become apparent. First the pinpoint becomes a diffuse blob. All of the same photons are still there, they are just spread over a larger area. It becomes easier to detect a collimation error the more the telescope is defocused. Next, notice that the center of the blob will blacked out. This is the shadow of the secondary mirror. And lastly, defraction circles will surround the central black blob. The central shadow and the defraction rings viewed in a perfectly collimated telescope will appear perfectly round, and perfectly centered within one another. Anything else is an uncollimated telescope, and adjustment is required to achieve perfect collimation.

In order to adjust collimation, the adjustment screws or knobs are turned in small increments. The result is then checked at the eyepiece. If the adjustment improves collimation, continue to make small adjustments in that direction until achieving perfection. If collimation worsens, adjust back to the original position, and make a small adjustment in the opposite direction. The adjustment screws should be snug, not tight or loose. If a screws should seem overly tight or loose while adjusting, slightly adjust the other two screws in the opposite direction.

Short arms vs. long telescope. If the person doing the collimation has long arms and a short telescope, it may be possible to turn the adjustment screws while observing the effect in the eye piece in real time. More often, this is not the case. Two people working together might be effective, especially if these two people work together often, and know how to collimate with minimal communication. Usually, an experienced collimator will be able to get the job done quickly working alone. As a guide to determine which screw to adjust, a person working alone can observe the direction in which collimation is off, and determine which screw to adjust by putting a finger or other thin object in front of the objective in that direction. Once the finger and the collimation error are aligned, it will be pointing to the screw that requires adjustment.

Some steps will require that the telescope be purposefully defocused. The out of focus position can be either inside of focus, or outside of focus. It really does not make any difference technically. A habit of always defocusing in the same direction simplifies the collimation process by making the results of a given action predictable. This permits one to quickly develop a sense of which adjustment screw to turn, and in which direction it should be turned.

Whether or not to collimate with a star diagonal in the optics path is another point of debate. A high-quality diagonal in the optics path is acceptable if this configuration is contemplated for visual observation. Keep in mind that the directional effects of a certain adjustment to which one has become accustomed my be reversed. There is no good reason to place a diagonal in the optical path for astrophotography, so remove the diagonal when collimating for astrophotography. So finally, here are the basic collimation steps:

  1. Thermally stabilize the telescope
  2. Center the collimation target in the eyepiece
  3. Adjust the collimation screws to achieve the desired result
  4. Re-center the collimation target in the eyepiece
  5. Repeat until there is no need to re-center in the eyepiece

When collimating for absolute perfection, the best collimation target is always a star near the object to be observed in a dark sky under good seeing conditions. For a more casual collimation, there are some alternative targets that can be used for periodic or rough collimation. A star is still the best point source of light, and a dark sky with good seeing conditions is still desired. For even better seeing, select a star near the zenith.

Any alternative target must simulate the pinpoint light source that a star presents, and it must be placed sufficiently distant from the telescope that the telescope can be focused. Commercially manufactured laser targets are probably slightly better than the others that will be mentioned here. Because of the added cost and the added calibration steps of a laser target, and how easily an SCT might loose perfect collimation, this is not be an attractive alternative for collimating an SCT. Other alternative targets are deceptively simple. I have never used it, but the idea that I like is a chrome ball bearing in direct sunlight. There is only one pinpoint spot on the ball bearing that reflects sunlight back toward the telescope. A glass Christmas tree ball works as well. Another is a bulb in a box, with the open end facing the telescope, and covered with a pin-pricked sheet of aluminum foil.

That covers the basics, so now on to the actual collimation procedure. I divide the procedures into rough and precise. In the precise procedure, I further call out what is needed for the occasional collimation or for even more precise collimation that would be conducted before every observation or image capture.

Collimation Procedures

Rough Collimation.

  1. Select an eyepiece that provides a magnification of roughly the aperture of the telescope in millimeters. E.g., an 11″ telescope aperture is 280mm, so use an eyepiece that provides about 280x magnification. For an 11″ F/10 telescope, which has a 2800mm focal length, use a 10mm eyepiece (magnification = telescope focal length/eyepiece focal length)
  2. Select a bright target star of 1st magnitude or greater, or use one of the alternative targets previously described
  3. Defocus as much as possible to reveal the collimation error, if any. Proceed to Precise Collimation if no error can be detected.
  4. Determine which screw will correct the error, and adjust 1/8 turn in the required direction
  5. Return to the eye piece, recenter the target, and readjust if necessary
  6. Repeat the last two steps until recentering and readjusting is no longer necessary

Precise Collimation.

  1. Select an eye piece magnifies 2x the telescope aperature in millimeters. Using the 11″ telescope example, 560x, which would require at least 5mm focal length eye piece
  2. Select a target star of 2nd (e.g. Polaris) or 3rd magnitude near the zenith for casual/infrequent collimation, or near the object to be observed for a one-time collimation
  3. Defocus as much as possible to reveal the collimation error, if any
  4. Determine which screw will correct the error, adjust 1/8 turn in the required direction
  5. Return to the eye piece, recenter the target, readjust if necessary. Proceed to Step 7 if no error is detected.
  6. Repeat the last two steps until recentering and readjusting is no longer necessary
  7. Precisely focus the star, and observe first diffraction ring in the airy disk pattern. Note, the airy disk will not be visible under marginal seeing conditions.
  8. Adjust, if necessary, using 1/16th turn at a time until the first diffraction ring around the disk is complete and uniform


This completes our examination of SCT collimation for casual visual observation or precise astrophotography. First, we explored the phenomenology that make collimation possible, and the SCT optical system that is of interest to us. Following next was the the a detailed treatment basics of collimating an SCT, along with the rational that explained the details behind each concept. Lastly, detailed procedures were provided to guide a knowledgeable astronomer through rough and precision collimation of an SCT. I frequently refesh my memory be reading through the entire article, and to make sure that I do not miss anything, I actually open and use these procedures when I collimate. You are welcome to do the same, and your feedback and suggestions will be valued.

© James R. Johnson, 2014.